What Happens if the Super Committee Fails? – Brookings Institution

What Happens if the Super Committee Fails? – Brookings Institution.

One of the major questions with the economy today is the question about the deficit of over $6 billion that the United States currently has and is growing.  However, one of the potential solutions to this problem lies with the Super Commitee that is proposing bipartisan cuts to spending that could be implemented within the next few years.  This Super Committee seems to be a good solution to a large and continuing problem.  Despite the apparent benefits, questions arise over what the implications are if the Super Committee is unable to agree about cuts for the next fiscal years.  If this so-called bipartisan organization is unable to agree on cuts, how is the polarized Congress going to be able to agree and implement such cuts in our economy?  This article posted by the Brookings Institution, explains the implications of the Super Committee failing to agree.  The major areas of concern are that if the Super Committee is unable to propose cuts in larger, more polarized sections of the budget, the government will be forced to further squeeze spending in areas in which they may be able to agree.  This leads to the non-defense discretionary spending including education, veterans, public safety, and low-income programs.  While the United States clearly needs to cut back in major areas in order to trim the deficit, being unable to agree will lead to forced cuts in areas rather than true analysis and debate between political parties on what would be the best solution for the country moving forward.  Sometimes handling big problems means going into the big causes and making big compromises––on BOTH sides.

European financial crisis: A growing gap between France and Germany – The Washington Post

European financial crisis: A growing gap between France and Germany – The Washington Post.

 

While people in the United States often only think about domestic issues, what is going on in the world around us also has an impact on the United States as well.  Especially European powers also have a major effect on the United States because of their economic interdependence with these nations.  Right now, France and Germany, the European region’s two largest economies, are currently divided on whether or not they should deploy drastic measures to calm nervous economic markets around the continent.  Because of the problems with near- bankrupt Greece and Italy, many European nations are in need of an upstart from the European Central Bank- the main part of the argument.  The center of the problem lies with whether the European Central Bank (ECB) should create euros to guard against potential government defaults.  The ECB has in the past been conservative because of its major stake in the entire nation and the problems with Germany in the past during their Depression-era hyperinflation, that some are comparing with this incident.  The world will clearly be watching and affected by the decisions made between these two major European economic powers.

Obama to begin 9-day Asia-Pacific trip with economic conference – CNN.com

Obama to begin 9-day Asia-Pacific trip with economic conference – CNN.com.

 

President Obama is starting his 9-day trip to the Asia-Pacific region with a speech in Hawaii about the fact that he will press for progress on a trans-Pacific free trade agreement.  He and the administration are focusing on the need to create Asia-Pacific relations to help President Obama’s works to create jobs and jumpstart the American economy.  Even though there is no assurance of any agreement between the nations on the trip, President Obama is hoping to facilitate talks that he hopes will benefit the relations between the countries in the future.

What We Spend on, and Get from, Higher Education | Neal McCluskey | Cato Institute: Policy Analysis

 

 

 

How Much Ivory Does This Tower Need? What We Spend on, and Get from, Higher Education | Neal McCluskey | Cato Institute: Policy Analysis.

 

I found this interesting report today about the effects of higher education on the workforce and society as a whole.  The author clearly has a bias against the costs vs. effects of higher education, but it brings up lots of important points to consider on both sides of the spectrum.

Taxes

Now that I have completed two debate tournaments on the topic, I feel that I have accumulated enough knowledge to explain the theories behind raising taxes or keeping them the same level as the 2003 level that President Bush imposed.

Raising Income Taxes

1) Need to raise revenue to cut our deficit and debt (not the same thing but intertwined)

-Increased revenue is only one part of the solution, but it is a vital part of the solution, tax cuts of 2003 accounts for almost 60% of our current budget deficit because of lack of revenue

2) Help the Government Stimulate the Economy

- Government money will be spent right away, while consumers saved their money rather than spent it after getting the tax reduction in 2003, not helping the economy

3) Raising Taxes Has Worked in the Past

-Clinton era, there were deficits and they raised taxes and helped stimulate the economy

 

Can’t Raise Income Taxes

1) Need to Keep Money in the Pockets of the Consumers

-Consumers spend into the big corporations which increases revenue for the government through corporate taxes, consumers are spending the money for vital programs

2) Raising Taxes Wouldn’t Have the Greatest Effect

- 50% of Americans don’t pay income taxes, so by increasing the amount that consumers pay in income taxes the government isn’t actually increasing revenue by that much, in order to actually fix the problem a policy that will have a bigger effect is needed

3) Not the Time to Do it Now (2012)

- FICA taxes are already increasing for consumers and revenue is being raised in this way, so we need to keep money in the hands of the people so that they can spend it and feel secure with their investments because so much of the economic growth is how confident the consumers are in investing in the market

 

Hopefully you understand a little bit more about taxes now.  Of course, there are rebuttals to all of these arguments, and feel free to bring these up in the comments section.

Social Security checks to rise for first time since 2009 – Oct. 19, 2011

Social Security checks to rise for first time since 2009 – Oct. 19, 2011.

 

In 2012, senior citizens will see their first increase in social security benefits, as cost of living adjustment (COLA) has added 3.6% to the cost of living.  Many senior citizens may not see this increase, however, because soon Medicare will show how much senior citizens will need to pay for 2012 and this is likely to increase (according to the article).  There will also be higher inflation index, however, meaning that workers will be paying more into the Social Security system.  Next year the Social Security tax will be based off of the first $110,100 of a person’s wages, making them pay more than the previous basis of $106,800.  This increase of benefits for seniors will be paid for with this increase in Social Security tax.  With the talks of the increasing deficit and debt, some are questioning this fiscal move, however senior citizens are welcoming the increase from the COLA adjustment.

Evolution of A Scandal – The Washington Post

Evolution of a scandal – The Washington Post.

Right now there is a big problem with the Mexican drug war and the effect that it is having on the safety of the Mexican people in gang violence as well as the problems with the United States-Mexican border.  There is an operation called ‘Fast and Furious’ that was being employed by the United States government to help counter the problems with drugs and specifically firearms being transported to Mexico.  This operation was to find the sources of firearms being transported into Mexico, so the patrol officers allowed the continued transfer of firearms across the border in order to try to find the start of the problem.  However, this was never cleared by the White House (or so they say) and it has come under fire because of the fact that many people criticize the ability of the smugglers to get firearms across without the government stopping and punishing them.  This has become open to debate and interpretation.  The problem? Many people, myself included, don’t really understand the inner workings of this operation nor do we have the true knowledge of the Mexican drug war in order to really debate or delve into the topic.  This Washington Post article I found has a chart that gives the general idea of what the Operation Fast and Furious was and the response to it in different levels of administration in order to help us start to breach the surface of this complex issue.  Check it out!

Protests in the United States

Recently we have seen protests cause uprisings in many Middle Eastern countries, including Egypt, Libya, and many others. But one place that many did not expect to see similar protest was right here in the United States.

Yet within the last few days, protests have popped up across the country about the problems with Wall Street and the US economy. One memorable sign stated the words ‘Turn Wall Street into Tahir Square,’ paralleling these protests to the ones in Egypt a few months ago.

While these protests haven’t gotten to the scale of other protests seen around the world, the prevalence of them were important enough that President Obama spoke in response to the protests this Thursday night. He has stated that these protests give voice to those who have concerns over the nation’s economy, however defended the economic system and gave some plans to work towards improvement in the future. The problems with this comes with the fact that everyone has a different view of what is most important and most prevalent today in relation to how to help spur economic growth. Although most economists agree that in the long term both spending cuts and tax increases are needed to get the economy out of its recession, politicians argue about what needs to be done first and what needs to be done on a bigger scale.

These protests aren’t the first signs of unhappiness with the government. There is a broader protest campaign that has been going on since July with the launch of a website calling for a march and sit-in at the New York Stock Exchange that has been using the hashtag #occupywallstreet on Twitter to spread its message. The use of social media has allowed protests and ideas to spread quicker than before, and also allows for a wider range of ideas to be published and discussed.

US Embassy in Syria Attacked

Today a group of men angry with the United States for meddling with their national problems and inciting violence attacked the US Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford by throwing tomatoes and rocks at him while he was going to a meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. No one was injured in the incident, but Ford needed to be locked in a secured room until authorities could escort him away from the protesters.

This attack is coming from a state of tension between the United States and Syria in relation to the clashes the country has had with Turkey. Syria has had violent protests over the past few months from the independence and initiative shown by other Middle Eastern countries to change their regimes. Recently there have been clashes specifically between Syria and Turkey because of the brutal smackdowns of the protesters. Turkey has spoken out against the problems with the harsh regime’s responses and has worked with the United States to try to change what is going on in Syria. Within the past few days Turkey has placed an arms embargo on Syria and stopped a Syria-bound ship with guns and other weapons that leaders believe would’ve been used to suppress uprisings. The United States’ political position of working with Turkey caused supporters of President Assad to attack the US Ambassador and Embassy today.

Execution of Troy Davis Completed

Wednesday night the state of Georgia executed Troy Davis for the murder of an off-duty police officer, and pronounced him dead at 11:08 pm. The overall story of the case follows (from The Voice of Russia News Station): “What happened in this particular case is that there is a homeless man named Larry Young, who was hanging out with his girlfriend in a parking lot near Burger King. They were drinking. They ran out of beer, so Larry Young went to a local liquor store to purchase beer. As he came out of the liquor store, he was confronted by Sylvester “Red” Coles, who was the alternative suspect. Red demanded Larry to give him his beer. When Larry Young refused, Red, who had the reputation in the neighbourhood of being a thug, threatened him. He followed him back to the Burger King parking lot. He said: “Listen, man, you don’t know me. I’ll shoot you.” And this is all over a bottle of beer. Troy Davis and another young man, D.D. Collins, were in the parking lot, observing what Red was doing but did not participate in it. They did not have any exchange with Larry Young and there were no words between them. Larry Young’s girlfriend at that time, Harriet Murray, observed all of this happening. Her initial statement to the police was: “I saw one man following Larry Young and threatening him. He said:”You don’t know me. I’ll shoot you.” Then he reached into his waistband. He pulled out a gun and he pistol-whipped Larry Young. And just then, because of the cries of Larry Young asking for help, officer McPhail, who was working off-duty at that Burger King parking lot, came around the corner and was shot. Only the person, who Harriet Murray saw with a gun, was Red Coles, not Troy Davis. Red Coles ran away and hid from the police and the next day he was scared that people were telling the police that he was the one who committed the crime. So he went and got his lawyer. And the lawyer and Red went into the police station and told the police that Troy Davis was there and that Troy Davis was the shooter. And from that moment forward the police were fixated on making a case against Troy Davis. They did not investigate Red Coles. He lied to them and said he didn’t have a gun. He later admitted he had a gun but conveniently lost it. And police never did anything to investigate Red Coles. They just said they built the case against Troy Davis. And the way they did it was they took the picture of Troy Davis, they flashed it all over the news for days. That same picture was put into the group of five other pictures and the witnesses were asked “Do you recognize the shooter?” That was the evidence against Troy Davis.”

He had been in trials for 20 years and maintained his belief of his innocence until his death. Many were arrested protesting for Davis’s innocence, and some are using this case as a way to justify getting rid of capital punishment because they believe that Davis was innocent. Some analysts are even saying that race played a significant role in this case because Troy Davis was an African American man who was alleged to have shot a Caucasian police officer. This case ended unhappily for Davis and his family, but others may believe that justice has now been served.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.